By — Catherine Rampell Catherine Rampell Leave a comment 0comments Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/the-fate-of-bats-is-hanging-in-the-balance-that-could-have-very-real-consequences-for-us Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Transcript Audio The World Health Organization is expected to release a report on its investigation into the origins of the novel coronavirus in the coming days. Among the many theories is the unproven belief that it was passed on from bats — leading to much public fear of the mammals. But the growing threat to bats could mean bad news for us too. Special correspondent Catherine Rampell reports. Read the Full Transcript Notice: Transcripts are machine and human generated and lightly edited for accuracy. They may contain errors. Judy Woodruff: The World Health Organization is expected to release its report soon the origins of the coronavirus. Many researchers suspect the virus began in bats and somehow was passed to humans, adding to public fears around the winged creatures.But the species is under threat, and that is not good news for humans.Special correspondent and Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell has the story. And a note: Parts of this report were shot before the pandemic. Man: Everybody's scared. Catherine Rampell: There's a P.R. push to help bats. Man: We're an easy target. People have bought into this: I'm dark. I'm brooding. I'm malevolent. I'm bad. Apparently, it's our fault. Catherine Rampell: And truth be told, bats could use all the help they can get.Humans have long feared this spooky species. Today, things are much worse, since many blame bats for causing the pandemic. There's no hard proof that they did, but, around the world, bats have been subject to misguided, sometimes gruesome attacks. Winifred Frick: How the virus that causes the COVID pandemic got into the human population is still under scientific investigation. Catherine Rampell: Biologist Winifred Frick: Winifred Frick: Scapegoating bats is unjustified. And it also shifts the focus away from the real responsible party, which is ourselves and the way that we treat the planet. Catherine Rampell: She means not respecting boundaries between humans and wildlife. In fact, humans have been a bigger threat to bats than bats are to humans.Over the past 15 years, millions of bats have disappeared from North America due to a fungus probably brought into caves by hikers. It causes a disease called white-nose syndrome. Winifred Frick: It's like a really bad case of athlete's foot. So the fungus actually grows into their skin tissues, and that makes them wake up too frequently while they're trying to hibernate. And then there's nothing to eat during the winter. And so they starve to death before spring. Sam Freeze: Hey, Rebecca, can you lower this one down more? Catherine Rampell: Pre-pandemic, we joined biologists at a park in Virginia as they captured bats to track the disease. Sam Freeze: Ironically, we actually wear batting gloves for this, but they're baseball batting gloves. Catherine Rampell: Sam Freeze is a researcher at Virginia Tech. His friends call him Batman, but he also shares a name with the caped crusader's nemesis, Mr. Freeze. Arnold Schwarzenegger: The iceman cometh. Catherine Rampell: So, what do the bats think of you? Do they think you're a hero or a villain?(LAUGHTER) Sam Freeze: Oh, I'm sure they're just terrified for their life. They probably think I'm a big bad predator trying to eat them. Catherine Rampell: Back at the picnic tables, our bat underwent a thorough physical exam. Sam Freeze: Wing score is zero. Catherine Rampell: Zero meaning no sign of scarring from white-nose syndrome.Not all of her species are so lucky though. The northern long-eared bat is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Jeremy Coleman: There are very few wildlife diseases that have affected so many species in such a short period of time. Catherine Rampell: Jeremy Coleman, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Jeremy Coleman: In certain locations, upwards of 90 percent or more of certain species are gone as a result of white-nose syndrome. Catherine Rampell: Because bats only produce one pup per year, it would take a long time to rebuild the population. Jeremy Coleman: I have heard various estimates of 500 to 600 years. Catherine Rampell: So, in just over a decade, we have lost the same number of bats that it would take half-a-millennium to recover? Jeremy Coleman: Yes. Catherine Rampell: You might wonder why humans should care. There's the moral argument. As Earth's stewards, we have a duty to protect all creatures. Conservationists have also tried to win allies with economic appeals.Our flying friends kind of work for us. Each night, they eat at least half their body weight in insects, including pests that attack crops. Nick Lapham: The Farm at Sunnyside: This was one of our most prolific bat fields. Catherine Rampell: And what about right now? Nick Lapham: Almost none. Catherine Rampell: Nick Lapham, a conservationist and philanthropist, owns an organic vegetable farm in Virginia. He bought it in 2006. Nick Lapham: There were bats everywhere. Catherine Rampell: That year, white-nose syndrome was first discovered in Upstate New York. Soon, it hit bats in Virginia. Nick Lapham: We went from having them ubiquitous on the landscape to really over the course of two summers virtually gone. Catherine Rampell: Lapham lost a valuable farmhand. Nick Lapham: As an organic farm, we can't spray chemical pesticides. So, nature is our front-line defense against insect pests. The decline of bats, there are studies that suggest it could mean billions of dollars in losses to U.S. agriculture. Catherine Rampell: He and other farmers, like Michigan apple grower Steve Tennes, have scrambled to find other ways to control pests. Steve Tennes: Insects is really our number one issue, because nobody wants a worm in their apple. Catherine Rampell: Without the bats around, he has to wing it. For the apple maggot, sticky red balls are put out in early summer. Steve Tennes: And so this bug thinks, hey, here's a nice big red apple. It lands on it to lay its eggs, and then it never flies away.The pyramid kind of mirrors the look of a tree trunk. Catherine Rampell: Then there's this contraption, which the snout beetle likes to climb. Steve Tennes: Eventually, it goes into this removable trap and gets trapped up in here.This is a pheromone. Catherine Rampell: Finally, sexy smells leave the codling moth too dazed and confused to mate. Steve Tennes: Therefore, there's no eggs laid on the apples. Catherine Rampell: None of this comes cheap. Steve Tennes: It does add up a lot. Bats by far are the most economical insect management device. Eyal Frank: How do we value nature? Catherine Rampell: Environmental economist Eyal Frank tries to measure what exactly we lose when we lose a species. Eyal Frank: How much is it worth for you to preserve polar bears or pandas or butterflies? Catherine Rampell: Why do we need to put a dollar value on a panda or a butterfly? Eyal Frank: If we don't inform those policy discussions about what is the value of a species, we're essentially implicitly assuming a value of zero. Catherine Rampell: The sudden loss of bats, though, can show how nature adds value. First, in the year or so following white-nose syndrome's arrival in a county, farmers revenues plunge about 50 percent. Eyal Frank: Because they have fewer products to sell and or they just have lower-quality product, and they receive a lower price for it. Catherine Rampell: Insurance claims for insect damage shoot up 30-fold. Then, like organic farmers, conventional farmers seem to adjust pest control strategies, and expenses go up. Eyal Frank: There is a very big increase in insecticide use. Catherine Rampell: Which has downstream effects for human health. Eyal Frank: Because they are toxic by design. And I find that indeed infant mortality rates go up. And I can mostly attribute that to the births that are conceived during the pesticide application season between April and July. Catherine Rampell: It's a butterfly effect of sorts. But instead of a butterfly flaps its wings, of course, it's bats not flapping theirs.Other studies have estimated the harm to humans when whales, bees, sea stars, and other parts of the ecosystem disappear. Nick Lapham: In the case of sea stars, the role that they play in supporting fisheries, in the case of bats, the role that they play in supporting agriculture, massive potential impacts for which we are really not prepared. Catherine Rampell: Some might worry this suggests a species with no documented economic contributions isn't worth saving. But that's not the right takeaway, says economist Frank. Ecosystems are complex and interconnected. Eyal Frank: Imagine you get on a plane and you and you start unscrewing randomly screws here and there. How many can you take out before the plane stops getting you from destination A to B safely? Catherine Rampell: Biologist Frick agrees. Winifred Frick: For too long, people have thought that conservation is sort of this altruistic exercise, when, really ,it is part and parcel to our species being able to persist on this planet. Sam Freeze: One, two, three. There they go, back off into the forest to hunt for insects. Catherine Rampell: For the "PBS NewsHour," I'm Catherine Rampell. Sam Freeze: All right, good job, team. Listen to this Segment Watch Watch the Full Episode PBS NewsHour from Mar 17, 2021 By — Catherine Rampell Catherine Rampell